That’s the Court of Appeal case that we’ve been talking about all week. It happened to come in time for my deadline for my Family Law column, so my analysis of it is over there.
I know not all of you read Family Law, so here is the link.
In very short terms, the Court of Appeal layeth the smackdown on those people who were pushing, stretching and exagerrating Re B-S to be an authority for “leave no stone unturned, climb every mountain, ford every stream – till you avoid adoption, that’s B-S’s dream”. BUT Re B, and Hale’s formulation stands – the President specifically says that Courts can’t make a Placement Order unless satisfied that Lady Hale’s formulation applies, and every single bit of content in Re B-S still applies. In a nutshell, Re R says to advocates, don’t take bad points and don’t appeal on flimsy technicalities based on your notion of what a post Re B-S judgment looks like.
It’ll never die, you can’t unheard what’s been said for a start, and we keep it alive by using it to the max